by Afeni Neville (2026)
A founder-led redesign: restructuring a scattered, twenty-five-year-old fashion brand around one entry and four clear doors.

ER-ZUM-AH The Label is a one-woman fashion house with twenty-five years behind it. It was previously known as Bestow Elan. Her work has been in Grazia and on Thandie Newton. Her website led with a 10%-off pop-up before you'd seen a single garment. Her clothes, her teaching, her accessories and her community were split across twelve platforms, none of which pointed to each other.
I restructured the site around the founder, with four clear ways in: the collections, the accessories, the studio and the community. I tested two directions with seven women, and built a V1 prototype in Wix.
May-June 2026
UX/UI Designer (sole designer)
Figma, Canva, Wix, Claude (AI-assisted documentation & prototyping)

The brand's strongest assets: the founder, the print families, the story, went missing at the point of purchase. The homepage opened on a generic tagline with no founder presence and no product above the fold, and the catalogue was organised by inventory filters rather than the print families that carry the brand's meaning.
Twenty-five years of credibility sat buried beneath a generic tagline and a mailing-list pop-up. A first-time visitor could not tell who made the work, or why it was different, before scrolling past it.
The customer, who arrived curious from social media and left without context, and the founder, whose hard-won equity the site failed to carry.
The live homepage, scrolled in sequence. Five friction points identified before a single product is reached.
Entry

Navigation & Entry: social, search and menu dominate. No brand identity visible.
Pop-up

Below the Fold: mailing list interrupts before any browsing.
Hero

Hero Copy: generic tagline, no founder, no product above the fold.
Catalogue

Catalogue (continued)

Catalogue Structure: inventory filters, mood labels, no print family logic.
Product Grid

Recognition: 30+ competing badges, no visual hierarchy
The homepage had two jobs: hold the attention a visitor arrived with, and show who she is and why she matters without making them hunt for it. Naming recognition across the catalogue, whether people could recall a family name unprompted, was the one measurable signal I carried into testing.

The brand was scattered: the clothing on the label site, the teaching and patterns on a separate Studios site and on Skillshare, the accessories on Etsy, the cotton garments on Adjoaa, the community on social media. Each part had built its own audience; no single place held them together.
The founder's own voice was the strongest asset the brand had, hidden in plain sight. On her most engaged channel, posts written in her voice drew more comment and conversation than product posts of the same garments: the clothes got likes; she got conversations. The trust signal was already working everywhere except the place a customer could actually buy. So she was never a problem to design around; she was the material to build with.
The site had 364 sessions across 90 days, but little usable analytics behind it. It worked mainly as a basic shell to sell from, so tracking had never been a priority for the founder. Conversion and referral figures weren't reliably attributable, so rather than lean on numbers I couldn't stand behind, I based the redesign on qualitative usability testing. What the analytics couldn't show, the founder could: she told me her customers preferred to buy through Etsy rather than her own site, which was part of her reason for wanting a rebuild.
A heuristic evaluation is a structured way of auditing an interface against a set of established usability principles, rather than against other websites. I used Nielsen Norman's ten heuristics, the industry-standard list, and went through the live site principle by principle, noting where it broke each rule and what the redesign would do in response. Eight of the ten surfaced clear, repeated issues. Two, error prevention and error recovery, were lighter for a content-led store rather than a complex transactional one, and I've noted them as such rather than forcing findings that weren't there. The table reads left to right: the principle, the problem on the current site, and the move the redesign makes against it.
heuristics with clear issues
lighter findings, noted honestly
total heuristics evaluated
Adaeze, the primary persona, is a culturally intentional buyer in her forties who discovers the brand on Instagram and wants original construction she cannot find elsewhere. Anna, a secondary persona drawn from a real observed customer, represents reach and advocacy: proof the work travels beyond its core community.

Adaeze, primary persona. Representative image (AI-generated); the persona is a research composite.
Primary Persona
£55k+ income · Commutes by train · Culturally intentional
Wants original construction she can't find elsewhere
Follows Erzumah on Instagram · Suburban London or US · Age 35–60
Secondary Persona (Real, Observed)
52 · Instagram following ~142,000 · Outside the brand's core cultural communityZ
Bought a scarf on Etsy, styled and shared it: the scarves sold well
Anna is proof the product already generates demand. Her followers who wanted the scarf had to find it on a marketplace where the label is invisible. A structured direct site is where that demand should have landed. Where Adaeze is depth, offering cultural connection and repeat loyalty, Anna is spread: discovery through a delighted customer's own voice. Drawn from a real customer observed over early 2026, anonymised here.
Adaeze's empathy map distilled what she says, thinks, does and feels approaching a brand like this.
I keep seeing her stuff on Instagram but I don't really know who she is
Is this the same person who sells the bandanas on Etsy?
I want something that actually looks different to everything else
I don't want to look like I'm wearing a costume
Where would I even buy this, direct from her?
Is this brand legitimate? Who is actually behind it?
Will this fit my body and my life, not just look good on a model
Is this overpriced for what it is, or is there real craft here?
Does buying from her support someone real, not a faceless company
If I buy this, will people ask me where it's from?
Scrolls past sponsored fashion ads without stopping
Saves Instagram posts to a collection instead of buying immediately
Checks reviews and other platforms before trusting a small brand
Follows for months before ever making a purchase
Shares standout pieces with friends before buying for herself
Drawn in by construction and colour she hasn't seen elsewhere
Slightly suspicious of brands that feel too generic or templated
Proud to support a Black British designer with real heritage
Frustrated when she can't find basic information: sizing, story, who made it
Reassured by seeing other women who look like her wearing the pieces
The pain points and opportunities fed three test hypotheses: founder trust, family-page recognition, real photography.
Two journeys were mapped: the current-site friction journey, where the path to purchase repeats and accumulates from landing to product; and a pre-testing hypothesis journey for Adaeze across both design directions, discovery to purchase and return.
The friction journey
5 friction points accumulated before purchase intent can form.
The mapped hypothesis
Tested head-to-head across both directions. Table below shows the full hypothesis journey.
Customer journey map: Adaeze. Touchpoints, the action each direction asked of her, her likely emotion, the pain points carried over, and the opportunity at each stage.

Adaeze · Discovery to purchase and return · Pre-testing hypothesis map
Curious
TOUCHPOINTS
Instagram · Social media
PAIN POINT
Site not easily findable from Instagram
OPPORTUNITY
Clear CTA linking Instagram to site
Unsettled
TOUCHPOINTS
Homepage · Mobile entry
PAIN POINT
Pop-up and badges confuse on arrival
OPPORTUNITY
Founder presence at entry
Connected
TOUCHPOINTS
Founder quote · Brand story
PAIN POINT
No founder context in Direction B
OPPORTUNITY
Journal and founder story (Direction C)
Interested
TOUCHPOINTS
The Label · Family browse
PAIN POINT
Family names lack explanation
OPPORTUNITY
Family pages with founder voice
Respect
TOUCHPOINTS
Family page · Product page
PAIN POINT
Badges don't connect to family pages
OPPORTUNITY
Construction notes on product page
Excited
TOUCHPOINTS
Add to bag · Size check
PAIN POINT
Size guidance insufficient
OPPORTUNITY
Prominent size guidance and returns
Welcomed
TOUCHPOINTS
The Alignment · Email capture
PAIN POINT
Email form feels generic
OPPORTUNITY
WhatsApp and niche community links
Satisfied
TOUCHPOINTS
Purchase · Return visit
PAIN POINT
No community confirmation
OPPORTUNITY
Journal content drives return visits
The core path: discovery, browse, purchase, was mapped for both directions — Founder First and Print as Hero — with the decision points and drop-off routes marked. It set what each screen had to carry before any were drawn.

The homepage began as a low-fidelity concept: founder-first hero, the press strip, one featured piece, then the four doors. Structure before detail.

Low fidelity concept. Redrawn for legibility from the original sketch
The restructure did two things at once. Nine inventory filters, all of them ways of slicing the clothing, collapsed into two product doors: The Collections and Accessories. Two further doors, Studios and The Alignment, gave the teaching practice and the community a place in the architecture for the first time; the old navigation hadn't acknowledged either. Four doors where there had been an undifferentiated product grid, with the founder and her story surfaced at entry rather than buried beneath it.

Information architecture: before and after. Nine inventory filters and a buried story, beside four clear doors and a founder-led structure. On Wix.
Four homepage directions were wireframed on mobile, each testing a different hypothesis about what the brand needed to lead with.
Founder First and Print as Hero were taken to high-fidelity prototype and tested head-to-head — the only way to settle which trust signal worked harder: the person or the work.

The two directions weren't chosen on taste. The research had left one question unresolved: what is the trust signal for this brand, the founder, or the work? Each direction is the strongest possible expression of one answer. Founder First tests that the person is the signal (supported by her social data, where her voice out-performed her products). Print as Hero tests that the work is the signal (supported by twenty-five years of construction craft that could reasonably speak first). Both were taken to high-fidelity, interactive prototypes and tested head-to-head, because head-to-head testing was the only way to settle a question the audit couldn't.
Founder First · mobile prototype


Print as Hero · mobile prototype



Founder First won decisively. It was built on these decisions: The founder leads; one featured collection replaces a row of equal-weight options; naming follows the print families rather than inventory categories. Her existing sage (#E6EEE9) stayed the system colour, as a V1 prototype meets the client where she is, rather than imposing a palette overhaul.
The clearest disagreement of the project was naming. The audit had surfaced a real problem: on the live site, mood labels in her voice ("Stunningly Chic") collided with functional product names ("Mercy Print Drape Side Shirt") at equal visual weight, so a visitor couldn't tell what the product was actually called. My three-part system, print family, an energy word, then the product form, was built to fix that: the energy layer was meant to give those scattered mood labels one fixed home. The founder felt the result was "more of a theme than a story" and that it would break the instinctive way she names things. Rather than settle it on authority, I carried both instincts into testing. I dropped the energy layer and simplified to her family-led logic, and seven of seven testers then recalled the family name "Mercy" unprompted. I was right about the problem; she was right about the fix. The community section, tested as "Seen in the Wild," became "Out and About" afterwards, a warmer register.
The homepage moved from a generic, product-less entry to a founder-led one.

Before. Generic tagline, no founder, no product.








After. Founder-first entry, built in Wix.





Seven women new to the brand, moderated, on mobile, comparing the two directions head-to-head.
"Put her story at the front door, not buried in a journal section you have to find." — Judy
"That's a sentence a writer wrote. That's not a product description, that's a craft statement." — Danni
The founder-led entry won decisively: the hero declaration stopped every Founder First tester before they looked at anything else, and all four reached the journal within two minutes, unprompted. All seven testers recalled "Mercy" unprompted.
The initial prototype used the full Sankofa quote as the hero line. The V1 build distilled it to one short line in her own voice: I'm back. And I brought everything with me. Followed by READ MY JOURNEY → and a boxed CTA: ENTER THE LABEL. The philosophy is intact; the barrier is gone. The full quote lives in the Journal where context exists around it. In the V1, her story now sits at the front door, one tap from the hero through Read My Journey, while the Journal stays in the footer as the archive it was on the live site.
The community section was renamed: "Seen in the Wild" became "Out and About," a warmer register, and the naming system was simplified to the founder's own family-led logic after testing confirmed it built recall. All seven testers asked to see a wider range of women in the photography, which made a photography commission urgent.
The V1 homepage leads with the founder, carries a press strip (Grazia, Vogue, Daily Express, New African Woman) and one featured collection (Mercy), then opens into the four doors.

The four doors, as built. "ER-ZUM-AH's World": one entry each for the collections, accessories, the studio teaching and the community, called The Alignment.
Further down, Out and About shows women from the community wearing ER-ZUM-AH in their own world, so visitors can see the clothes on real women, and Join the Alignment closes the page before the footer.
A quiet declaration of handmade elegance. Five pieces from our latest editorial series, where construction is the soul and the print is the surface.
The Mercy Collection. The featured lead: a founder-voice descriptor and a five-piece carousel, in place of the old equal-weight grid.

The full prototype walkthrough is in the video at the top of this case study
All seven testers recalled the lead family unprompted: the family-led structure built recognition as intended. The founder's own response mattered as much: seeing the two directions, what struck her wasn't a preference between them but that structure let her see the whole brand at once, organising was the intervention, not the aesthetic. Hard conversion data will only be available once the build goes live; the V1 continues to iterate with the founder.
The brand was rich, not thin, so the temptation was to simplify it into legibility. The founder pushed back on naming and on colour, and both times she was right. Analytics were thin, so the research leaned on audit and interview rather than behavioural data.
Culturally attuned UX means holding identity, storytelling and meaning intact while making them navigable. Most of the work was getting out of the way of what was already true.
What I would improve next time

This project did not give ER-ZUM-AH a new identity. It revealed and structured the one that was already there.
She did not need a better website. She needed to see what she had already built.

This one challenged and stretched me, and it is a pleasure to share. If it sparked a thought or a question,
Erzumah Case Study — UX & Brand Research
UX/UI CASE STUDY