UX/UI CASE STUDY

ER-ZUM-AH The Label

by Afeni Neville (2026)


A founder-led redesign: restructuring a scattered, twenty-five-year-old fashion brand around one entry and four clear doors.



Watch the 2-minute walkthrough, or read the full case study below.

Loading...

01.

Project Overview

PROJECT SUMMARY


ER-ZUM-AH The Label is a one-woman fashion house with twenty-five years behind it. It was previously known as Bestow Elan. Her work has been in Grazia and on Thandie Newton. Her website led with a 10%-off pop-up before you'd seen a single garment. Her clothes, her teaching, her accessories and her community were split across twelve platforms, none of which pointed to each other.

I restructured the site around the founder, with four clear ways in: the collections, the accessories, the studio and the community. I tested two directions with seven women, and built a V1 prototype in Wix.

DURATION

May-June 2026

ROLE

UX/UI Designer (sole designer)

TOOLS USED

Figma, Canva, Wix, Claude (AI-assisted documentation & prototyping)

02.

Problem Statement

WHAT PROBLEM WAS BEING SOLVED


The brand's strongest assets: the founder, the print families, the story, went missing at the point of purchase. The homepage opened on a generic tagline with no founder presence and no product above the fold, and the catalogue was organised by inventory filters rather than the print families that carry the brand's meaning.

WHY IT MATTERED

Twenty-five years of credibility sat buried beneath a generic tagline and a mailing-list pop-up. A first-time visitor could not tell who made the work, or why it was different, before scrolling past it.

WHO WAS AFFECTED

The customer, who arrived curious from social media and left without context, and the founder, whose hard-won equity the site failed to carry.

03.

First Impression Audit


The live homepage, scrolled in sequence. Five friction points identified before a single product is reached.

Entry


Navigation & Entry: social, search and menu dominate. No brand identity visible.

Pop-up


Below the Fold: mailing list interrupts before any browsing.

Hero

Hero Copy: generic tagline, no founder, no product above the fold.

Catalogue

Catalogue (continued)


Catalogue Structure: inventory filters, mood labels, no print family logic.

Product Grid


Recognition: 30+ competing badges, no visual hierarchy

04.

Goals and Objectives

What the redesign had to do, and how I'd know it worked.



BUSINESS GOALS

  • Unify a scattered ecosystem under one roof.
  • Surface the founder and the brand story at entry.
  • Make the full brand discoverable in one place the founder controls, so a buyer who only knows one product from a marketplace can find the whole label, however they choose to buy.

USER GOALS

  • Understand who the founder is, what she makes, and why it matters: at a glance, without hunting for it.
  • Find the work without wading through inventory filters.
  • Trust the maker before being asked to buy.

SUCCESS CRITERIA

The homepage had two jobs: hold the attention a visitor arrived with, and show who she is and why she matters without making them hunt for it. Naming recognition across the catalogue, whether people could recall a family name unprompted, was the one measurable signal I carried into testing.

05.

Research

RESEARCH METHODS USED


  • A channel audit across the brand's twelve touchpoints
  • A review of the available Wix analytics
  • A founder interview to surface the language and intent behind the work


KEY FINDINGS

The brand was scattered: the clothing on the label site, the teaching and patterns on a separate Studios site and on Skillshare, the accessories on Etsy, the cotton garments on Adjoaa, the community on social media. Each part had built its own audience; no single place held them together.

INSIGHTS GATHERED

The founder's own voice was the strongest asset the brand had, hidden in plain sight. On her most engaged channel, posts written in her voice drew more comment and conversation than product posts of the same garments: the clothes got likes; she got conversations. The trust signal was already working everywhere except the place a customer could actually buy. So she was never a problem to design around; she was the material to build with.

SUPPORTING DATA

The site had 364 sessions across 90 days, but little usable analytics behind it. It worked mainly as a basic shell to sell from, so tracking had never been a priority for the founder. Conversion and referral figures weren't reliably attributable, so rather than lean on numbers I couldn't stand behind, I based the redesign on qualitative usability testing. What the analytics couldn't show, the founder could: she told me her customers preferred to buy through Etsy rather than her own site, which was part of her reason for wanting a rebuild.

06.

Heuristic Evaluation

A STRUCTURED AUDIT OF THE LIVE SITE AGAINST NIELSEN NORMAN'S TEN USABILITY PRINCIPLES.


A heuristic evaluation is a structured way of auditing an interface against a set of established usability principles, rather than against other websites. I used Nielsen Norman's ten heuristics, the industry-standard list, and went through the live site principle by principle, noting where it broke each rule and what the redesign would do in response. Eight of the ten surfaced clear, repeated issues. Two, error prevention and error recovery, were lighter for a content-led store rather than a complex transactional one, and I've noted them as such rather than forcing findings that weren't there. The table reads left to right: the principle, the problem on the current site, and the move the redesign makes against it.

1

heuristics with clear issues

2

lighter findings, noted honestly

3

total heuristics evaluated


THE AUDIT


KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • The brand's identity — the founder's voice, her story, her credentials — was buried in the footer and behind unclear labels, hidden from the very people it would convert.
  • The catalogue was organised by inventory type and mood labels, not by the print families customers already recognise and return for.
  • A 10%-off pop-up fired before any browsing had happened, interrupting trust before it had a chance to form.
  • Thirty-plus badges, competing banners, and clearance at equal visual weight created noise that obscured what the site was actually for.
  • There was no clear path back for a returning visitor: nine filters but no family landing pages, and no quick route to the collection she came for.

07.

User Understanding

PERSONAS


Adaeze, the primary persona, is a culturally intentional buyer in her forties who discovers the brand on Instagram and wants original construction she cannot find elsewhere. Anna, a secondary persona drawn from a real observed customer, represents reach and advocacy: proof the work travels beyond its core community.

Adaeze, primary persona. Representative image (AI-generated); the persona is a research composite.

ADAEZE


Primary Persona

£55k+ income · Commutes by train · Culturally intentional

Wants original construction she can't find elsewhere

Follows Erzumah on Instagram · Suburban London or US · Age 35–60


USER NEEDS

  • Proof the brand is legitimate and made by a real person.
  • Clothing that looks different without tipping into costume.
  • Clear sizing and provenance.
  • To see women who look like her wearing the pieces.

PAIN POINTS

  • No brand story or credentials on the site.
  • Twelve platforms, and no single trusted place to buy direct.
  • Imagery that overlooked her.

OPPORTUNITIES

  • Founder story above the fold builds trust before she shops.
  • Family pages and real photography answer her hesitations directly.
  • A single destination that unifies the scattered ecosystem.


ANNA


Secondary Persona (Real, Observed)

52 · Instagram following ~142,000 · Outside the brand's core cultural communityZ

Bought a scarf on Etsy, styled and shared it: the scarves sold well


USER NEEDS

  • To feel that buying direct is a more meaningful way to support the person who made it — an instinct the research already shows matters to this brand's customers — rather than just a transaction on a marketplace she happens to be in.
  • To recognise, from the piece itself, that it's part of a larger brand world worth exploring further.
  • A clear, current answer to "who makes this and is it credible?" in the place she's actually looking.

PAIN POINTS

  • Even when given the direct site and an incentive, buyers like her have defaulted back to repurchasing on Etsy rather than switching. Nothing about the direct site experience has made switching feel worth it.
  • The item she bought carries none of the brand's naming system (Kiki, Mercy, etc.) that the dresses do. Nothing in the purchase signals a wider collection exists behind it.
  • The one place meant to establish legitimacy isn't built for that job. It foregrounds a defunct brand (Bestow Elan), gives the current label a single closing line, and ends on a vague call to action, rather than clearly answering "who makes this, and is it credible?"

WHY SHE MATTERS

Anna is proof the product already generates demand. Her followers who wanted the scarf had to find it on a marketplace where the label is invisible. A structured direct site is where that demand should have landed. Where Adaeze is depth, offering cultural connection and repeat loyalty, Anna is spread: discovery through a delighted customer's own voice. Drawn from a real customer observed over early 2026, anonymised here.

08 ·

Empathy Map

EMPATHY MAP: ADAEZE


Adaeze's empathy map distilled what she says, thinks, does and feels approaching a brand like this.

SAYS

I keep seeing her stuff on Instagram but I don't really know who she is

Is this the same person who sells the bandanas on Etsy?

I want something that actually looks different to everything else

I don't want to look like I'm wearing a costume

Where would I even buy this, direct from her?

THINKS

Is this brand legitimate? Who is actually behind it?

Will this fit my body and my life, not just look good on a model

Is this overpriced for what it is, or is there real craft here?

Does buying from her support someone real, not a faceless company

If I buy this, will people ask me where it's from?

DOES

Scrolls past sponsored fashion ads without stopping

Saves Instagram posts to a collection instead of buying immediately

Checks reviews and other platforms before trusting a small brand

Follows for months before ever making a purchase

Shares standout pieces with friends before buying for herself

FEELS

Drawn in by construction and colour she hasn't seen elsewhere

Slightly suspicious of brands that feel too generic or templated

Proud to support a Black British designer with real heritage

Frustrated when she can't find basic information: sizing, story, who made it

Reassured by seeing other women who look like her wearing the pieces

The pain points and opportunities fed three test hypotheses: founder trust, family-page recognition, real photography.

09.

Journey Mapping and User Flows

CUSTOMER JOURNEY MAPS


Two journeys were mapped: the current-site friction journey, where the path to purchase repeats and accumulates from landing to product; and a pre-testing hypothesis journey for Adaeze across both design directions, discovery to purchase and return.

JOURNEY 1: CURRENT SITE

The friction journey


  • Pop-up interrupts before any browsing begins
  • Generic tagline — no founder, no product above the fold
  • Catalogue organised by inventory, not meaning
  • 30+ competing badges with no hierarchy
  • No family landing pages — no shortcut for returning visitors

5 friction points accumulated before purchase intent can form.

JOURNEY 2: REDESIGN HYPOTHESIS

The mapped hypothesis


  • Founder present at entry: story before product
  • Four clear doors, family-led navigation
  • Print family pages gather meaning in one place
  • The Alignment: email capture at a natural moment
  • Construction notes and size guidance on product page

Tested head-to-head across both directions. Table below shows the full hypothesis journey.

Customer journey map: Adaeze. Touchpoints, the action each direction asked of her, her likely emotion, the pain points carried over, and the opportunity at each stage.


10.

STAGE MAP

JOURNEY 2: REDESIGN HYPOTHESIS


Adaeze · Discovery to purchase and return · Pre-testing hypothesis map

1

DISCOVERY

Curious

TOUCHPOINTS

Instagram · Social media

PAIN POINT

Site not easily findable from Instagram

OPPORTUNITY

Clear CTA linking Instagram to site


2

ARRIVAL

Unsettled

TOUCHPOINTS

Homepage · Mobile entry

PAIN POINT

Pop-up and badges confuse on arrival

OPPORTUNITY

Founder presence at entry


3

PURCHASE CONNECTION

Connected

TOUCHPOINTS

Founder quote · Brand story

PAIN POINT

No founder context in Direction B

OPPORTUNITY

Journal and founder story (Direction C)


4

BRAND EXPLORATION

Interested

TOUCHPOINTS

The Label · Family browse

PAIN POINT

Family names lack explanation

OPPORTUNITY

Family pages with founder voice


5

PRODUCT DISCOVERY

Respect

TOUCHPOINTS

Family page · Product page

PAIN POINT

Badges don't connect to family pages

OPPORTUNITY

Construction notes on product page


6

CONSIDERATION

Excited

TOUCHPOINTS

Add to bag · Size check

PAIN POINT

Size guidance insufficient

OPPORTUNITY

Prominent size guidance and returns


7

COMMUNITY & CULTURE

Welcomed

TOUCHPOINTS

The Alignment · Email capture

PAIN POINT

Email form feels generic

OPPORTUNITY

WhatsApp and niche community links


8

PURCHASE & RETURN

Satisfied

TOUCHPOINTS

Purchase · Return visit

PAIN POINT

No community confirmation

OPPORTUNITY

Journal content drives return visits

11.

User Flows

STRUCTURE BEFORE SCREENS


The core path: discovery, browse, purchase, was mapped for both directions — Founder First and Print as Hero — with the decision points and drop-off routes marked. It set what each screen had to carry before any were drawn.


12.

Ideation, Architecture and Wireframes

FROM FIRST SKETCH TO FOUR DIRECTIONS. STRUCTURE DECIDED BEFORE DETAIL.


The homepage began as a low-fidelity concept: founder-first hero, the press strip, one featured piece, then the four doors. Structure before detail.

Low fidelity concept. Redrawn for legibility from the original sketch


Design exploration — information architecture

The restructure did two things at once. Nine inventory filters, all of them ways of slicing the clothing, collapsed into two product doors: The Collections and Accessories. Two further doors, Studios and The Alignment, gave the teaching practice and the community a place in the architecture for the first time; the old navigation hadn't acknowledged either. Four doors where there had been an undifferentiated product grid, with the founder and her story surfaced at entry rather than buried beneath it.



Information architecture: before and after. Nine inventory filters and a buried story, beside four clear doors and a founder-led structure. On Wix.


MID-FIDELITY WIREFRAMES

Four homepage directions were wireframed on mobile, each testing a different hypothesis about what the brand needed to lead with.

Founder First and Print as Hero were taken to high-fidelity prototype and tested head-to-head — the only way to settle which trust signal worked harder: the person or the work.


13.

Prototyping and Iteration

INTERACTIVE PROTOTYPES


The two directions weren't chosen on taste. The research had left one question unresolved: what is the trust signal for this brand, the founder, or the work? Each direction is the strongest possible expression of one answer. Founder First tests that the person is the signal (supported by her social data, where her voice out-performed her products). Print as Hero tests that the work is the signal (supported by twenty-five years of construction craft that could reasonably speak first). Both were taken to high-fidelity, interactive prototypes and tested head-to-head, because head-to-head testing was the only way to settle a question the audit couldn't.

Founder First · mobile prototype

Print as Hero · mobile prototype



DESIGN DECISIONS

Founder First won decisively. It was built on these decisions: The founder leads; one featured collection replaces a row of equal-weight options; naming follows the print families rather than inventory categories. Her existing sage (#E6EEE9) stayed the system colour, as a V1 prototype meets the client where she is, rather than imposing a palette overhaul.

ITERATION EXAMPLES

The clearest disagreement of the project was naming. The audit had surfaced a real problem: on the live site, mood labels in her voice ("Stunningly Chic") collided with functional product names ("Mercy Print Drape Side Shirt") at equal visual weight, so a visitor couldn't tell what the product was actually called. My three-part system, print family, an energy word, then the product form, was built to fix that: the energy layer was meant to give those scattered mood labels one fixed home. The founder felt the result was "more of a theme than a story" and that it would break the instinctive way she names things. Rather than settle it on authority, I carried both instincts into testing. I dropped the energy layer and simplified to her family-led logic, and seven of seven testers then recalled the family name "Mercy" unprompted. I was right about the problem; she was right about the fix. The community section, tested as "Seen in the Wild," became "Out and About" afterwards, a warmer register.


BEFORE-AND-AFTER COMPARISON

The homepage moved from a generic, product-less entry to a founder-led one.



Before. Generic tagline, no founder, no product.


After. Founder-first entry, built in Wix.



14.

Testing and Validation

USABILITY TESTING PROCESS


Seven women new to the brand, moderated, on mobile, comparing the two directions head-to-head.

USER FEEDBACK

"Put her story at the front door, not buried in a journal section you have to find." — Judy

"That's a sentence a writer wrote. That's not a product description, that's a craft statement." — Danni

KEY LEARNINGS

The founder-led entry won decisively: the hero declaration stopped every Founder First tester before they looked at anything else, and all four reached the journal within two minutes, unprompted. All seven testers recalled "Mercy" unprompted.

The initial prototype used the full Sankofa quote as the hero line. The V1 build distilled it to one short line in her own voice: I'm back. And I brought everything with me. Followed by READ MY JOURNEY → and a boxed CTA: ENTER THE LABEL. The philosophy is intact; the barrier is gone. The full quote lives in the Journal where context exists around it. In the V1, her story now sits at the front door, one tap from the hero through Read My Journey, while the Journal stays in the footer as the archive it was on the live site.

CHANGES MADE BASED ON FINDINGS

The community section was renamed: "Seen in the Wild" became "Out and About," a warmer register, and the naming system was simplified to the founder's own family-led logic after testing confirmed it built recall. All seven testers asked to see a wider range of women in the photography, which made a photography commission urgent.

15.

Final Solution

HIGH-FIDELITY DESIGNS


ER-ZUM-AH'S World

The V1 homepage leads with the founder, carries a press strip (Grazia, Vogue, Daily Express, New African Woman) and one featured collection (Mercy), then opens into the four doors.

The four doors, as built. "ER-ZUM-AH's World": one entry each for the collections, accessories, the studio teaching and the community, called The Alignment.
Further down, Out and About shows women from the community wearing ER-ZUM-AH in their own world, so visitors can see the clothes on real women, and Join the Alignment closes the page before the footer.


The Mercy Collection

A quiet declaration of handmade elegance. Five pieces from our latest editorial series, where construction is the soul and the print is the surface.

The Mercy Collection. The featured lead: a founder-voice descriptor and a five-piece carousel, in place of the old equal-weight grid.


FINAL PROTOTYPE

The full prototype walkthrough is in the video at the top of this case study

KEY IMPROVEMENTS

  • Founder-led entry, carrying the recognition social already built.
  • One featured collection in place of equal-weight options.
  • Family-led naming at the point of decision.
  • A real-customer photography strand.
  • The brand's own voice, in place of generic fashion language.
  • A restrained editorial palette that frames the prints.

OUTCOMES AND IMPACT

All seven testers recalled the lead family unprompted: the family-led structure built recognition as intended. The founder's own response mattered as much: seeing the two directions, what struck her wasn't a preference between them but that structure let her see the whole brand at once, organising was the intervention, not the aesthetic. Hard conversion data will only be available once the build goes live; the V1 continues to iterate with the founder.

16.

Reflection

CHALLENGES ENCOUNTERED

The brand was rich, not thin, so the temptation was to simplify it into legibility. The founder pushed back on naming and on colour, and both times she was right. Analytics were thin, so the research leaned on audit and interview rather than behavioural data.

LESSONS LEARNED

Culturally attuned UX means holding identity, storytelling and meaning intact while making them navigable. Most of the work was getting out of the way of what was already true.

What I would improve next time

  • Recruit advocate-customers like Anna, and marketplace buyers directly, to test how far customer styling drives discovery and turn that demand toward the direct site.
  • Instrument the build for real conversion data once it launches.
  • Budget more time for the photography commission the testing made urgent.
  • Run a study on the founder's vernacular. She wants to push further into her own language, and the open question is how far that lands with the 35–60 customer before it needs translation.

THE LAST WORD

This project did not give ER-ZUM-AH a new identity. It revealed and structured the one that was already there.

She did not need a better website. She needed to see what she had already built.

Thank You for Reading

This one challenged and stretched me, and it is a pleasure to share. If it sparked a thought or a question,



Erzumah Case Study — UX & Brand Research